|
This eleven-plaintiff lawsuit was filed in
November 2004, following 5- to 7-year administrative proceedings
initiated by the landowners in January 1997. These proceedings –
called Beneficial Use Determination (BUD) hearings – allowed Monroe
County to override its restrictive land development regulations
(LDRs) to avoid getting sued in inverse condemnation – which is what
happened here.
Flush with "real estate bubble" money in 2004-05,
the Monroe County Commission retained outside counsel – from Kansas
City, Los Angeles, and Washington DC – in the belief that
the more money it paid to lawyers, the better chance plaintiffs and
their attorneys would give up and go away. Now, in 2009, Monroe
County cannot even pay its employees, much less its out-of-state
lawyers.
Monroe County's genius lawyers filed
motion-after-motion, defenses-after-defenses, took depositions of
every plaintiff and their spouses, including three elderly,
non-resident plaintiffs who live in nursing homes as far away as
California, and ran up bills of $1.2 million, plus another $130,000
in travel expenses, even before the new judge decided to
dismiss this case in June 2007.
After Chief Judge Richard Payne retired at the
end of 2006, a successor judge – who exhibited no understanding of
this complex area of regulatory taking law, and treated the
litigants with a pro-government bias – dismissed the case on statute
of limitation grounds – six months into his judicial career,
on June 6, 2007. On June 30, 2008, a three-judge panel of Florida's
Third District Court of Appeal heard oral arguments in Collins v
Monroe County, as well as a companion case, Shands v City of
Marathon – dismissed by the same judge. The panel –
comprised of Chief Judge David Gersten and District Court Judges
Juan Ramirez and Richard Suarez – was visibly unimpressed with
the governments' statute of limitation theories. Written opinions,
reversing the trial judge and remanding both cases to the trial
court, were released on December 31, 2008.
For all the details of the Collins case, click on the
links below. The State and County
filed Petitions for Discretionary Review by the Florida Supreme Court,
and the Collins response is due April 20, 2009.
To view a case's docket sheet, you need to
access the Clerk's website.
Click on: Official Records | Online Records | Accept | Civil Cases
(do not click the search button). This opens a form where you can
type in the case number, CA-M-04- 379 (Collins), or
CA-M-07-99 (Shands) , then click Submit. Click on the
icon under View Detail. This brings up the docket sheet in a popup
window. (Disable popup blocker before clicking.) Print the docket
sheet by clicking on the printer icon in the popup window.
Background Facts
September 15, 1986, marked a turning point in a series of legislative
and administrative actions to "preserve" the Florida Keys, by imposing
confiscatory land use regulations in violation of the Due Process and
Taking Clauses of the Florida and United States Constitutions.
Single-family, residential subdivisions were re-zoned to allow only one
dwelling unit (DU) per acre, even though the lots rarely exceeded 7,500
sq ft in area. Building moratoria were imposed on large areas of the
Keys, driving down property values and devastating the reasonable
expectations of thousands of individual Keys' landowners.
In 1992, Monroe County adopted a
rate-of-development (ROD) ordinance for a 10-year period, in order
to "improve hurricane evacuation clearance times." In 1996, the
Florida Administration Commission (the Governor and Cabinet, now
just four elected officials) and the Florida Department of Community
Affairs adopted, and forced Monroe County to adopt, even more
confiscatory regulations. The County and State casually abandoned
the "safety" rationale for controlling the rate of development in
the Keys. In its stead, they morphed the ROD process into an
unabashedly confiscatory scheme to destroy the market for
undeveloped land. This has allowed the State and County to acquire
thousands of privately-owned parcels for around 15% of the Fair
Market Value the landowners would have received in an eminent domain
proceeding.
On January 3, 1997, the eleven landowners
in the Collins lawsuit filed Petitions for
Beneficial Use
Determinations (BUD) because their properties were
undevelopable, either because of environmental or density
restrictions, or were barred from use by moratoria of indefinite
duration. In December 2000, four years after Plaintiffs had
petitioned for administrative relief, a Monroe County Special Master
conducted their BUD hearings. The Special Master recommended all 11
plaintiffs be paid Just Compensation, as the subject properties were
unusable (and nobody knew when, or if, they might become useable in
the future). After the Special Master released his Recommended
Orders -- which took from one to three years -- the Monroe County
Commission adopted his recommendations, by formal Resolutions
between March 2002 and March 2004, in each of the 11 Plaintiffs'
cases. Each Resolution concludes with the words that the petitioner
is "entitled to Just Compensation."
But there was no connection between the
phrase Just Compensation in the County's Resolutions, and
the U.S. Supreme Court's definition of those words in the United
States Constitution. Under Florida law, when private property owners
are deprived -- by regulations, not physical occupation -- of
substantially all beneficial use of their property, the owners are
entitled to jury trials, in Eminent Domain, to determine the
Just Compensation a condemning authority must pay.
By March 2004, the Collins
plaintiffs had a 4-year statute of limitation clock ticking,
starting with the dates of their BUD Resolutions, in which they
could bring inverse condemnation suits against the County and/or the
State. This has since been confirmed by the Third District Court of
Appeal in Collins, et al. v. Monroe County & the State of
Florida, Case No. 3D07-1603 (Dec. 31, 2008). Realizing that the
government was not planning to compensate them, as required by both
the Florida and U.S. Constitutions, the Collins plaintiffs
brought this action for Just Compensation, against Monroe County and
the State of Florida, on November 22, 2004.
|